Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Extensive Electro-Anatomical Guided Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Extensive Electro-Anatomical Guided Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Not yet recruiting · NCT06745167 · Registry updated 2024-12-20Clinical trials
Swipe the table sideways for more columns.
| Trial | Conditions | Status | Phase | Updated | More info | NCT ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Extensive Electro-Anatomical Guided Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation | Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Pathologic Processes, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms, atrial fibrillation, cardiovascular disorder, heart disorder | Not yet recruiting | Not applicable | 2024-12-20 | NCT06745167 |
9 results · Page 1 of 1
Organizations
Swipe the table sideways for more columns.
1 results · Page 1 of 1
Research sites
Swipe the table sideways for more columns.
| Research sites | City | Country | Linked trials |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. 241, West Huaihai Road | Shanghai | China | 2 |